This Supreme Court Case Threatens the Future of Tribal Lands – The Nation Fund for Independent Journalism

  • About Us
  • What We Do
    • Internship
    • Studentnation
    • 2025 Puffin Student Writing Fellows
    • 2025 Student Journalism Conference
    • Nation Classroom
    • Fellowship for the Future of Journalism
  • Memorial Fund
    • The Victor Navasky Memorial Fund
    • Celebrating Victor Event
    • Donate to the Memorial Fund
    • When Giving Feels Personal
  • News
  • Apply
  • Join us
  • Donate
Skip to content

NEWS

News > This Supreme Court Case Threatens the Future of Tribal Lands

October 5, 2022

This Supreme Court Case Threatens the Future of Tribal Lands

By Lisa Herforth-Hebbert

Haaland v. Brackeen challenges the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, putting the sovereignty of Indian Nations at risk.

By Jessica Lambert

A protest march in New York City against the Dakota Access Pipeline in 2017. (Erik McGregor / Getty Images)

This November, the Supreme Court will hear Haaland v. Brackeen—a case that could have catastrophic consequences for Indian country. The plaintiffs are challenging the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, arguing that the law discriminates against non-Indian adoptive parents on the basis of race. More specifically, they claim that the law institutionalizes discrimination against white families in the adoption of American Indian children.

The plaintiffs’ argument fails to take into account the reasons why the ICWA prioritizes the placement of Indian children in Indian homes. American Indian identities are derived solely from the status as citizens of our Tribal Nations (that is, “American Indian” is a political status—not a racial identity).

This case is about so much more than Indian youth and this single law, and Anti-Indian constituencies have jumped at the chance to support the plaintiffs. “For the beneficiaries of centuries of forced dispossession and murder of Native people to cry ‘discrimination’ when Native groups try to stop them from taking their children is madness. And yet it’s totally on brand for the modern conservative movement,” explained Elie Mystal in The Nation last week. If the Supreme Court sides with the plaintiffs and thus establishes a new precedent, inappropriately racializing Indian identity, the implications of this case could be far-reaching.

Read full article.

Category: Featured StudentNation

Featured

To Suppress the Latest Protest, Columbia Unveils a Violent New Form of Campus Policing
Trump Is Taking a Wrecking Ball to Indigenous Education
Almost 140 Years After the Haymarket Affair, Will Workers Fight for the 4-Day Week?

More Articles

520 8th Avenue, Fl 21
New York, NY 10018

  • Contact Us
  • Apply
  • Support Us
  • Privacy Policy

All content © 2025. All Rights Reserved.

The Nation Fund for Independent Journalism is a 501(c)(3) organization, and donations are tax deductible to the fullest extent provided by law.

Follow Us

The Nation Fund for Independent Journalism is a 501(c)(3) organization, and donations are tax deductible to the fullest extent provided by law.

All content © 2025. All Rights Reserved.